Skip to main content

Flanking Service

A flanking service is any service that can be deployed on a flanking node.
A flanking node is a node running flanking services, so that creates a circular argument.

In practice, flanking services are services leveraging native Kafka stream processing.

To better understand this, we need to briefly unpack what separates a flanking service from a non-flanking service.

Flanking vs regular services

A flanking service it needs to adhere to two criteria:

  • The service is a client of a Morio service
  • The service is not a dependency for/of other Morio services

When both conditions are met, the service can run as a flanking service, and thus be deployed on a flanking node which can be scaled up or down at will.

Let’s look at some examples to clarify this further.

Flanking service example: The connector service

The connector service is responsible for routing data from and to external systems.

To accomplish that, the service — a Logstash instance — will act as a client to the broker service. In the capacity of consumer when reading data from the Morio broker service, and in the capacity of producer when writing data to the broker service.

Apart from this, the connector service has no dependencies on other services. Furthermore, other Morio services have no dependencies on the connector service.

This makes the service a flanking service. It can run on a broker node — as any service — but it can also run on a flanking node.

You might start out by running everything on a single node. Then, as you start processing more data and adding more pipelines, you can spin up a new host, install Morio on it, and join it as a flanking node. Now, you can run your connector service on this flanking node instead.

Later, you might even add 2 more nodes and run 3 connector services in parallel working together as a single consumer group.

This shows the flexibility of flanking services. They can run on any node and you can move them around without having to worry about the implications of resizing the cluster.

Regular service example: The ui service

The ui service provides the Morio web-based user interface. It’s built as a so-called composable web architecture where all its interactivity is backend by the api service.

That makes it sound like a great candidate for a flanking service. After all, it’s just a client of the API service. Using the ui service is just a more user-friendly way to talk to the api service.

However, the ui service relies on the proxy service for TLS termination, enforcing authentication through middleware, and some other things. So to deploy it, we’d also need to deploy the proxy service with it.

We could in principle manage all of these different combinations but that would brush up against our design goals of keeping it as simple as possible.

Summary

Given the constraints outlines above, flanking services are without exception services providing stream processing over the Kafka protocol. Their ability to scale horizontally is provided partially by Morio handling the configuration and deployment of the service, but also hinges on the Kafka-native abilities such as consumer groups.

These stream processing services are also the most obvious candidates for horizontal scaling as these services tend to consume much more compute and memory resources than say, the ui service.